From the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, 6th edition, chapter 1:
Journal articles are usually reports of empirical studies, literature reviews, theoretical articles, methodological articles, or case studies.
Categories of Journal Articles:
Primary source research articles are also known as empirical studies. According to thePublication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition (p. 10):
Empirical studies are reports of original research. These include secondary analyses that test hypotheses by presenting novel analyses of data not considered or addressed in previous reports. They typically consist of distinct sections that reflect the stages in the research process and that appear in the following sequence:
- introduction: development of the problem under investigation, including its historical antecedents, and statement of the purpose of the investigation;
- method: description of the procedures used to conduct the investigation;
- results: report of the findings and analyses; and
- discussion: summary, interpretation, and implications of the results.
Some examples of empirical studies below.
To search PsycINFO for empirical studies, there is a limit on the Advanced Search screen, toward the bottom:
Note: selecting that option does not guarantee all your results will be exclusively empirical studies. You'll need to read the article very carefully to ensure you have found original research. Further, you may need to track the citation backward to find the citation for the original research (This is a research strategy called cycling.) See the video link on the left for a demonstration of how to search methodologies in PsycINFO.
According to the Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association, Sixth Edition (p. 10):
Literature reviews, including research syntheses and meta-analyses, are critical evaluations of material that has already been published. In meta-analyses, authors use quantitative procedures to statistically combine the results of of studies. By organizing, integrating, and evaluating previously published material, authors of literature reviews consider the progress of research toward clarifying a problem. In a sense, literature reviews are tutorials, in that authors
- define and clarify the problem;
- summarize previous investigations to inform the reader of the state of research;
- identify relations, contradictions, gaps, and inconsistencies in the literature; and
- suggest the next step or steps in solving the problem.
The components or literature reviews can be arranged in various ways (e.g., by grouping research based on similarity in the concepts or theories of interest, methodological similarities among studies reviewed, or the historical development of the field).
See an example of a literature review below.
|Author||Author's credentials are given, usually a scholar with subject expertise.||Author may not be named; a professional writer or journalist who publishes on a wide variety of topics and lacks subject expertise.|
|Audience||Scholars, researchers, students.||General public.|
|Citation||Sources cited in footnotes and/or bibliography.||Rare. Scanty, if any, information about sources.|
|Review||Peer-reviewed or refereed by scholars in a similar or the same field.||Not reviewed or reviewed by non-specialized editors.|
|Publisher||Usually an academic or scholarly press.||None, unknown, or popular presses that publish a wide range of popular sources.|
|Format||Books & scholarly journal articles.||Magazines, websites, and newspapers.|
Our thanks to former OSU Librarian Dan Chaney for sharing many resources from his LibGuide.
Take this 9 question quiz to test your knowledge of the difference between scholarly vs. popular publications.